What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4881400 about?

The tribunal order states: Mulki Husien Abdiwahab and Al-wajdan Ahmed Said Al-maskari to pay [The

How much money was awarded in case 4881400?

Filing Fee: $20.44 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $880.33 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4881400?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4881400?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10562502-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4881400 about?

The tribunal order states: Mulki Husien Abdiwahab and Al-wajdan Ahmed Said Al-maskari to pay [The

How much money was awarded in case 4881400?

Filing Fee: $20.44 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $880.33 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4881400?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4881400?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10562502-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Unit/Flat 415, 53 Cook Street, Auckland Central, Auckland Tenancy Tribunal Case 4881400 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Unit/Flat 415, 53 Cook Street, Auckland Central, Auckland Tenancy Tribunal Case 4881400 — Tenancy dispute | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4881400 — net $900.77 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal	$880.33	Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal
Filing fee reimbursement	$20.44	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$900.77
Bond	$1,920.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$900.77

Claims and awards for application 4881400 — net $900.77 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal

Amount: $880.33
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $20.44
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $900.77

Bond

Landlord $1,920.00

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $900.77

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rubbish Removal

Order

Mulki Husien Abdiwahab and Al-wajdan Ahmed Said Al-maskari to pay [The landlord/s] $900.77 from the bond, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,920.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) immediately apportioned as follows: [The landlord/s]: $900.77 Mulki Husien Abdiwahab and Al-wajdan Ahmed Said Al-maskari: $1,019.23

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, set down to be conducted via video. Neither party joined and calls out were made. The call to the landlord was answered. The calls to the tenants went unanswered and to voicemail. I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the second calls went unanswered.
The landlord has applied for compensation via the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.
The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and did not remove all rubbish. The carpet was stained and required cleaning.
The landlord had to replace light bulbs and smoke alarm batteries.
The amounts ordered are proved via an invoice and evidenced by a large number of photos. Filing fee
Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
Further, the Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4881400 — net $900.77 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal	$880.33	Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal
Filing fee reimbursement	$20.44	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$900.77
Bond	$1,920.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$900.77

Claims and awards for application 4881400 — net $900.77 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal

Amount: $880.33
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning, carpets and rubbish removal

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $20.44
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $900.77

Bond

Landlord $1,920.00

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $900.77

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rubbish Removal

Order

Mulki Husien Abdiwahab and Al-wajdan Ahmed Said Al-maskari to pay [The landlord/s] $900.77 from the bond, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,920.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) immediately apportioned as follows: [The landlord/s]: $900.77 Mulki Husien Abdiwahab and Al-wajdan Ahmed Said Al-maskari: $1,019.23

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, set down to be conducted via video. Neither party joined and calls out were made. The call to the landlord was answered. The calls to the tenants went unanswered and to voicemail. I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the second calls went unanswered.
The landlord has applied for compensation via the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.
The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and did not remove all rubbish. The carpet was stained and required cleaning.
The landlord had to replace light bulbs and smoke alarm batteries.
The amounts ordered are proved via an invoice and evidenced by a large number of photos. Filing fee
Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
Further, the Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4881400 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat 415, 53 Cook Street, Auckland Central, Auckland

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4881400 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat 415, 53 Cook Street, Auckland Central, Auckland

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions