What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5236671 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5236671?

Rubbish Removal: $2,102.05 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5236671?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5236671?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12085206-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5236671 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5236671?

Rubbish Removal: $2,102.05 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5236671?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5236671?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12085206-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

18A Greta Street, Glenview, Hamilton 3206 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5236671 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

18A Greta Street, Glenview, Hamilton 3206 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5236671 — Tenancy dispute | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5236671 — net $2,102.05 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rubbish removal	$2,102.05	Rubbish removal
Net award	$2,102.05
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,102.05

Claims and awards for application 5236671 — net $2,102.05 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rubbish removal

Amount: $2,102.05
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Net award

Landlord $2,102.05

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $2,102.05

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Rubbish Removal

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.
[The tenant/s] must pay Kāinga Ora–Homes And Communities $2,102.05 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Reasons

Both parties attended the teleconference hearing.
The landlord has applied for compensation following the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”).
The landlord said the tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
The landlord claimed $2,102.05 to remove rubbish from the outside of the property at the end of the tenancy. This included a wooden structure, a dog kennel and piles of wood, amongst other rubbish items.
The tenant acknowledged she had left these items and that she should have removed them herself before leaving the premises. The tenant agreed to a consent order being made in the landlord’s favour in the amount claimed by them for this rubbish removal, $2,102.05. Suppression
The tenant requested name suppression. The tenant has three young children, said she has started down a new path in her life and owned up to her mistakes, including not removing her rubbish from the property. The tenant was focused on consenting to the order and the process for making payment arrangements after the hearing to rectify the situation. In the circumstances and given the evidence, I find the tenant’s interests outweigh the public interest in publishing the tenant’s name. Therefore, I order that the tenant’s name and identifying details are not to be published. See section 95A(4) RTA.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5236671 — net $2,102.05 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rubbish removal	$2,102.05	Rubbish removal
Net award	$2,102.05
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,102.05

Claims and awards for application 5236671 — net $2,102.05 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rubbish removal

Amount: $2,102.05
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Net award

Landlord $2,102.05

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $2,102.05

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Rubbish Removal

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.
[The tenant/s] must pay Kāinga Ora–Homes And Communities $2,102.05 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Reasons

Both parties attended the teleconference hearing.
The landlord has applied for compensation following the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”).
The landlord said the tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
The landlord claimed $2,102.05 to remove rubbish from the outside of the property at the end of the tenancy. This included a wooden structure, a dog kennel and piles of wood, amongst other rubbish items.
The tenant acknowledged she had left these items and that she should have removed them herself before leaving the premises. The tenant agreed to a consent order being made in the landlord’s favour in the amount claimed by them for this rubbish removal, $2,102.05. Suppression
The tenant requested name suppression. The tenant has three young children, said she has started down a new path in her life and owned up to her mistakes, including not removing her rubbish from the property. The tenant was focused on consenting to the order and the process for making payment arrangements after the hearing to rectify the situation. In the circumstances and given the evidence, I find the tenant’s interests outweigh the public interest in publishing the tenant’s name. Therefore, I order that the tenant’s name and identifying details are not to be published. See section 95A(4) RTA.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5236671 — Tenancy dispute at 18A Greta Street, Glenview, Hamilton 3206

At a glance

Award balance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5236671 — Tenancy dispute at 18A Greta Street, Glenview, Hamilton 3206

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions