How much money was awarded in case 5328939?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Previous Order Application 5254180 D…: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $2,070.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5328939?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5328939?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12372655-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5328939?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Previous Order Application 5254180 D…: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $2,070.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5328939?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5328939?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12372655-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 5328939 — Rent arrears

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5328939 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5328939 — net $2,125.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$2,070.00	Rent arrears
Previous order application 5254180 dated	$27.00	Previous order application 5254180 dated
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,125.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,125.00

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.

The tenancy of Stacey Illingworth at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 am on Wednesday 10 September 2025.

Stacey Illingworth must pay [The landlord/s] $2,125.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

This order incorporates the Tribunal order under application 5254180.

Reasons

The landlord attended the video hearing.

The tenant did not attend the hearing by Teams video link. A telephone call was made to the tenant on the number provided at the allocated hearing time. The call went to voicemail. The Tribunal may hear matters in the absence of a party where satisfied that notice of the hearing has been given. I am satisfied that notice of the hearing was given to the tenant.

The tenant contacted Tenancy Services on the morning of the hearing. The tenant asked for the matter to be adjourned as the tenant was unwell. Tenancy Services responded to the request by asking the tenant to provide evidence of her illness. No evidence has been provided and no adjournment was granted. The matter proceeded in the absence of the tenant.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.

The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent on time and in full and by failing to lodge the required bond.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 19 August 2025 for the rent breach and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the rent remains in arrears at the date of this hearing.

The landlord served a 14-day breach notice on the tenant on 11 July 2025 for the tenants failure to lodge the required bond. It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the bond has still not been lodged by the tenant at the date of this hearing.

The tenancy is terminated on 10 September 2025 at which date the rent arrears will be $2,070.00. The landlord has provided copies of the rent arrears documents.

The Tribunal made an order for reimbursement of the filing fee under TT 5254180. The previous order is incorporated into this order for enforcement purposes.

As [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.

The landlord applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this hearing. Suppression of the landlord’s name and details is granted.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5328939 — net $2,125.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$2,070.00	Rent arrears
Previous order application 5254180 dated	$27.00	Previous order application 5254180 dated
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,125.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,125.00

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
The tenancy of Stacey Illingworth at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 am on Wednesday 10 September 2025.
Stacey Illingworth must pay [The landlord/s] $2,125.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:
This order incorporates the Tribunal order under application 5254180.

Reasons

The landlord attended the video hearing.
The tenant did not attend the hearing by Teams video link. A telephone call was made to the tenant on the number provided at the allocated hearing time. The call went to voicemail. The Tribunal may hear matters in the absence of a party where satisfied that notice of the hearing has been given. I am satisfied that notice of the hearing was given to the tenant.
The tenant contacted Tenancy Services on the morning of the hearing. The tenant asked for the matter to be adjourned as the tenant was unwell. Tenancy Services responded to the request by asking the tenant to provide evidence of her illness. No evidence has been provided and no adjournment was granted. The matter proceeded in the absence of the tenant.
The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.
The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent on time and in full and by failing to lodge the required bond.
The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 19 August 2025 for the rent breach and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.
It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the rent remains in arrears at the date of this hearing.
The landlord served a 14-day breach notice on the tenant on 11 July 2025 for the tenants failure to lodge the required bond. It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the bond has still not been lodged by the tenant at the date of this hearing.
The tenancy is terminated on 10 September 2025 at which date the rent arrears will be $2,070.00. The landlord has provided copies of the rent arrears documents.
The Tribunal made an order for reimbursement of the filing fee under TT 5254180. The previous order is incorporated into this order for enforcement purposes.
As [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.
The landlord applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this hearing. Suppression of the landlord’s name and details is granted.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5328939 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5328939 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions