How much money was awarded in case 5336102?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Previous Order Application 5250759 D…: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $11,000.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5336102?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5336102?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12544702-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5336102?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Previous Order Application 5250759 D…: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $11,000.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5336102?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5336102?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12544702-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

5 Inchinnam Road, Flat Bush, Auckland 2016 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5336102 — Rent arrears

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5336102 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal, on the application of the successful landlord, orders that the

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5336102 — net $7,055.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears as of 7 October 2025	$11,000.00	Rent arrears as of 7 October 2025
Previous order application 5250759 dated 3 June 2025	$27.00	Previous order application 5250759 dated 3 June 2025
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$7,055.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$7,055.00

The Tribunal, on the application of the successful landlord, orders that the landlord’s name and identifying details be suppressed.

The tenancy of Wei Liu at 5 Inchinnam Road, Flat Bush, Auckland 2016 is terminated. Possession is granted to the landlord at 5:00pm on 29 October 2025.

The Bond Centre is to release the bond of $4,000.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to the landlord, upon submission of the required documents and a copy of this order.

Wei Liu is ordered to pay the landlord $7,055.00 immediately, calculated as follows (this amount includes the Tribunal’s earlier order made on 3 June 2025 under application 5250759):

Reasons

The landlord applied for: a. Termination of the tenancy; b. Recovery of rent arrears; c. Refund of the bond; d. Reimbursement of the filing fee; and e. Suppression of its name and identifying details.

The landlord attended the hearing via video link. The tenant did not appear. Should the Tribunal proceed in the tenant’s absence?

The Tribunal waited 10 minutes for the tenant to join the hearing.

Two phone calls were made to the tenant’s only known mobile number (which previously worked for communication by the landlord), and a voice message was left. This number was used by the Registry to schedule and remind the tenant about the hearing.

The landlord confirmed the tenant’s email address, which was also used for service and reminders.

The tenant did not contact the Registry to request an adjournment or arrange alternative attendance.

The Tribunal is satisfied that the tenant was properly served. It therefore proceeds in the tenant’s absence, under section 92(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

How much rent does the tenant owe?

The landlord submitted rent records substantiating the arrears claimed.

The landlord advised that the tenant did not apparently dispute the debt and had only promised payment, without follow-through or a payment plan.

An unpaid filing fee under a mediated order dated 3 June 2025 for rent arrears is incorporated into this order for enforcement.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

As of the date of the landlord filing its application to the Tribunal, the tenant owed $7,000.00 – rent overdue by 49 days.

Under section 55(1)(a) of the Act, the tenancy must be terminated when rent is at least 21 days overdue.

Had the tenant appeared, the Tribunal could have considered a conditional termination with a payment plan to continue the tenancy. In the tenant’s absence, the termination is final.

Should the bond be refunded to the landlord?

Given the significant arrears, the full bond is to be refunded to the landlord.

The landlord must provide the required documentation and a copy of this order to the Bond Centre..

When is possession granted?

The landlord requested possession as soon as possible by Monday, 3 November 2025, allowing for the two-day enforcement stand-down period.

Therefore, possession is granted to the landlord from 5:00pm, Wednesday, 29 October 2025.

Should the filing fee be reimbursed?

As the landlord has been wholly successful in its claim, the filing fee is reimbursed under section 102(4) of the Act.

Should suppression be granted?

The landlord, having wholly succeeded in the proceedings, applied for name suppression.

Under section 95A of the Act, the Tribunal grants the order to suppress the landlord’s name and identifying particulars.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5336102 — net $7,055.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears as of 7 October 2025	$11,000.00	Rent arrears as of 7 October 2025
Previous order application 5250759 dated 3 June 2025	$27.00	Previous order application 5250759 dated 3 June 2025
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$7,055.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$7,055.00

Order

The Tribunal, on the application of the successful landlord, orders that the landlord’s name and identifying details be suppressed.
The tenancy of Wei Liu at 5 Inchinnam Road, Flat Bush, Auckland 2016 is terminated. Possession is granted to the landlord at 5:00pm on 29 October 2025.
The Bond Centre is to release the bond of $4,000.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to the landlord, upon submission of the required documents and a copy of this order.
Wei Liu is ordered to pay the landlord $7,055.00 immediately, calculated as follows (this amount includes the Tribunal’s earlier order made on 3 June 2025 under application 5250759):

Reasons

The landlord applied for: a. Termination of the tenancy; b. Recovery of rent arrears; c. Refund of the bond; d. Reimbursement of the filing fee; and e. Suppression of its name and identifying details.
The landlord attended the hearing via video link. The tenant did not appear. Should the Tribunal proceed in the tenant’s absence?
The Tribunal waited 10 minutes for the tenant to join the hearing.
Two phone calls were made to the tenant’s only known mobile number (which previously worked for communication by the landlord), and a voice message was left. This number was used by the Registry to schedule and remind the tenant about the hearing.
The landlord confirmed the tenant’s email address, which was also used for service and reminders.
The tenant did not contact the Registry to request an adjournment or arrange alternative attendance.
The Tribunal is satisfied that the tenant was properly served. It therefore proceeds in the tenant’s absence, under section 92(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

How much rent does the tenant owe?

The landlord submitted rent records substantiating the arrears claimed.
The landlord advised that the tenant did not apparently dispute the debt and had only promised payment, without follow-through or a payment plan.
An unpaid filing fee under a mediated order dated 3 June 2025 for rent arrears is incorporated into this order for enforcement.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

As of the date of the landlord filing its application to the Tribunal, the tenant owed $7,000.00 – rent overdue by 49 days.
Under section 55(1)(a) of the Act, the tenancy must be terminated when rent is at least 21 days overdue.
Had the tenant appeared, the Tribunal could have considered a conditional termination with a payment plan to continue the tenancy. In the tenant’s absence, the termination is final.

Should the bond be refunded to the landlord?

Given the significant arrears, the full bond is to be refunded to the landlord.
The landlord must provide the required documentation and a copy of this order to the Bond Centre..

When is possession granted?

The landlord requested possession as soon as possible by Monday, 3 November 2025, allowing for the two-day enforcement stand-down period.
Therefore, possession is granted to the landlord from 5:00pm, Wednesday, 29 October 2025.

Should the filing fee be reimbursed?

As the landlord has been wholly successful in its claim, the filing fee is reimbursed under section 102(4) of the Act.

Should suppression be granted?

The landlord, having wholly succeeded in the proceedings, applied for name suppression.
Under section 95A of the Act, the Tribunal grants the order to suppress the landlord’s name and identifying particulars.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5336102 — Rent arrears at 5 Inchinnam Road, Flat Bush, Auckland 2016

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5336102 — Rent arrears at 5 Inchinnam Road, Flat Bush, Auckland 2016

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

How much rent does the tenant owe?

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Should the bond be refunded to the landlord?

When is possession granted?

Should the filing fee be reimbursed?

Should suppression be granted?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

How much rent does the tenant owe?

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Should the bond be refunded to the landlord?

When is possession granted?

Should the filing fee be reimbursed?

Should suppression be granted?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions