What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5050243?

The tribunal order states: David Robert Shaw Imrie must pay Vision Property Management Limited as

How much money was awarded in case 5050243?

Cleaning: $506.00 awarded to landlord; Compensation: Proceeds from sale of…: $540.00 awarded to tenant; Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Previous Order Application 4982490 D…: $555.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $368.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $232.13 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5050243?

The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Cleanliness.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5050243?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11392750-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5050243?

The tribunal order states: David Robert Shaw Imrie must pay Vision Property Management Limited as

How much money was awarded in case 5050243?

Cleaning: $506.00 awarded to landlord; Compensation: Proceeds from sale of…: $540.00 awarded to tenant; Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Previous Order Application 4982490 D…: $555.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $368.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $232.13 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5050243?

The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Cleanliness.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5050243?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11392750-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

35D Wembley Street, Sydenham, Christchurch 8023 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5050243 — Property damage

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

35D Wembley Street, Sydenham, Christchurch 8023 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5050243 — Property damage | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5050243 — net $1,148.13 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024	$555.00		Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024
Repairs	$368.00		Repairs
Cleaning	$506.00		Cleaning
Lock/key replacement	$232.13		Lock/key replacement
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00		Filing fee reimbursement
Compensation: Proceeds from sale of goods		$540.00	Proceeds from sale of goods
Total award	$1,688.13	$540.00
Net award	$1,148.13
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$1,148.13

Claims and awards for application 5050243 — net $1,148.13 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024

Amount: $555.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024

Repairs

Amount: $368.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs

Cleaning

Amount: $506.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning

Lock/key replacement

Amount: $232.13
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Lock/key replacement

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $27.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Cleanliness Compensation Filing Fee Property damage

Order

David Robert Shaw Imrie must pay Vision Property Management Limited as Agent for Dhanbeer Singh $1,148.13 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing which was held by videoconference. The tenant did not attend and was unable to be contacted on the number specified in the Notice of Hearing which was served to the e-mail address given as an address for service by the tenant.
The landlord has applied for compensation and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy. Prior Order
The tenancy was ended on 5 September 2024 by an Order made on that date. That Order confirmed the rent arrears to the end of the tenancy and ordered that the bond be paid to the landlord. The balance owing under that Order remains outstanding and is incorporated into this Order.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Exit inspection photographs provided by the landlord show that: a. the premises were not left reasonably clean and tidy. It appears the tenant had simply not come back to the premises leaving belongings, decomposing foodstuffs and with no cleaning done. b. damage had been done to wall surfaces of what was a newly built property.
The keys were not returned.
The landlord took some personal effects to the police, disposed of goods with no sale value and was able to sell some of the goods left by the tenant. A credit is given for the sale proceeds received by the landlord.
The amounts claimed are proved by invoices paid by the landlord.
Because Vision Property Management Limited has succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5050243 — net $1,148.13 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024	$555.00		Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024
Repairs	$368.00		Repairs
Cleaning	$506.00		Cleaning
Lock/key replacement	$232.13		Lock/key replacement
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00		Filing fee reimbursement
Compensation: Proceeds from sale of goods		$540.00	Proceeds from sale of goods
Total award	$1,688.13	$540.00
Net award	$1,148.13
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$1,148.13

Claims and awards for application 5050243 — net $1,148.13 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024

Amount: $555.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Previous order application 4982490 dated 05/09/2024

Repairs

Amount: $368.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs

Cleaning

Amount: $506.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning

Lock/key replacement

Amount: $232.13
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Lock/key replacement

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $27.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Cleanliness Compensation Filing Fee Property damage

Order

David Robert Shaw Imrie must pay Vision Property Management Limited as Agent for Dhanbeer Singh $1,148.13 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing which was held by videoconference. The tenant did not attend and was unable to be contacted on the number specified in the Notice of Hearing which was served to the e-mail address given as an address for service by the tenant.
The landlord has applied for compensation and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy. Prior Order
The tenancy was ended on 5 September 2024 by an Order made on that date. That Order confirmed the rent arrears to the end of the tenancy and ordered that the bond be paid to the landlord. The balance owing under that Order remains outstanding and is incorporated into this Order.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Exit inspection photographs provided by the landlord show that: a. the premises were not left reasonably clean and tidy. It appears the tenant had simply not come back to the premises leaving belongings, decomposing foodstuffs and with no cleaning done. b. damage had been done to wall surfaces of what was a newly built property.
The keys were not returned.
The landlord took some personal effects to the police, disposed of goods with no sale value and was able to sell some of the goods left by the tenant. A credit is given for the sale proceeds received by the landlord.
The amounts claimed are proved by invoices paid by the landlord.
Because Vision Property Management Limited has succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5050243 — Property damage at 35D Wembley Street, Sydenham, Christchurch 8023

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5050243 — Property damage at 35D Wembley Street, Sydenham, Christchurch 8023

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions