What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5351710 about?

The tribunal order states: The Bond Centre is to pay the full bond to Property Brokers Limited.

How much money was awarded in case 5351710?

Property Damage: $341.63 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $333.50 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $3,441.84 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $471.50 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5351710?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears. Related themes: Property damage.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5351710?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12846204-Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5351710 about?

The tribunal order states: The Bond Centre is to pay the full bond to Property Brokers Limited.

How much money was awarded in case 5351710?

Property Damage: $341.63 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $333.50 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $3,441.84 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $471.50 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5351710?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears. Related themes: Property damage.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5351710?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12846204-Tribunal_Order.pdf.

149 Rangatira Drive, Mangakino 3421 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5351710 — Rent arrears

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5351710. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 22 September 2025	$3,441.84	Rent arrears to 22 September 2025
Rubbish removal	$471.50	Rubbish removal
Lock replacement	$341.63	Lock replacement
Reglaze broken window and repair towel rail	$333.50	Reglaze broken window and repair towel rail

The Bond Centre is to pay the full bond to Property Brokers Limited.

[The tenant/s] is to pay Property Brokers Limited $2,788.47, calculated as follows: DescriptionLandlord Rent arrears to 22 September 2025$3,441.84 Rubbish removal$471.50 Lock replacement$341.63 Reglaze broken window and repair towel rail$333.50 Total award$4,588.47 Minus Bond-$1,800.00 Tenant to pay$2,788.47

Reasons

The Landlord attended the hearing.

The Landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

How much is owed for rent?

The tenancy ended on 22 September 2025. The Landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy: $3,441.84

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.

The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.

I have viewed the Landlord’s pre-tenancy and post-tenancy photographs.

The cost of rubbish removal was $471.50 and I approve that amount as reasonable.

The tenant did not return the keys. I award the Landlord’s reasonable cost of replacing locks, including ranchslider doors: $341.63.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.

Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying incomerelated rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

There was a broken window and I have seen photographs before and after the tenancy to confirm the damaged had occurred during the tenancy. There was also a broken towel rail in the bathroom.

The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

The amounts ordered are proved: $333.50.

I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5351710. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 22 September 2025	$3,441.84	Rent arrears to 22 September 2025
Rubbish removal	$471.50	Rubbish removal
Lock replacement	$341.63	Lock replacement
Reglaze broken window and repair towel rail	$333.50	Reglaze broken window and repair towel rail

Order

The Bond Centre is to pay the full bond to Property Brokers Limited.
[The tenant/s] is to pay Property Brokers Limited $2,788.47, calculated as follows: DescriptionLandlord Rent arrears to 22 September 2025$3,441.84 Rubbish removal$471.50 Lock replacement$341.63 Reglaze broken window and repair towel rail$333.50 Total award$4,588.47 Minus Bond-$1,800.00 Tenant to pay$2,788.47

Reasons

The Landlord attended the hearing.
The Landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

How much is owed for rent?

The tenancy ended on 22 September 2025. The Landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy: $3,441.84

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.
The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
I have viewed the Landlord’s pre-tenancy and post-tenancy photographs.
The cost of rubbish removal was $471.50 and I approve that amount as reasonable.
The tenant did not return the keys. I award the Landlord’s reasonable cost of replacing locks, including ranchslider doors: $341.63.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.
Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying incomerelated rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
There was a broken window and I have seen photographs before and after the tenancy to confirm the damaged had occurred during the tenancy. There was also a broken towel rail in the bathroom.
The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
The amounts ordered are proved: $333.50.
I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5351710 — Rent arrears at 149 Rangatira Drive, Mangakino 3421

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5351710 — Rent arrears at 149 Rangatira Drive, Mangakino 3421

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

How much is owed for rent?

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

How much is owed for rent?

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions