What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5425703?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Raewyn Walker at 3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland

How much money was awarded in case 5425703?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $4,792.86 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $238.33 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5425703?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5425703?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13582280-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5425703?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Raewyn Walker at 3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland

How much money was awarded in case 5425703?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $4,792.86 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $238.33 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5425703?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5425703?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13582280-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland 2024 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5425703 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland 2024 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5425703 — Rent arrears | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5425703 — net $2,859.19 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 12/05/2026	$4,792.86	5. The applicant seeks rent arrears, water rates arrears, and termination of the tenancy.
Water rates to 08/04/2026	$238.33	Water rates to 08/04/2026
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,859.19
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,859.19

Claims and awards for application 5425703 — net $2,859.19 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears to 12/05/2026

Amount: $4,792.86
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: 5. The applicant seeks rent arrears, water rates arrears, and termination of the tenancy.

Water rates to 08/04/2026

Amount: $238.33
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates to 08/04/2026

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $28.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $2,859.19

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $2,859.19

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears Water Rates

Order

The tenancy of Raewyn Walker at 3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland 2024 is terminated, and possession is granted to 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Shi Yong Guo at 11:59pm on Tuesday 12 May 2026.
Raewyn Walker must pay 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Shi Yong Guo $2,859.19 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,200.00 (BN-00140429) to 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Shi Yong Guo immediately.

Reasons

The applicant attended the hearing by video link. The respondent did not attend or answer telephone contact attempts.
The applicant seeks rent arrears, water rates arrears, and termination of the tenancy.
Post-hearing, the applicant provided rent and water records showing the amounts owing. I am satisfied those records are accurate.
Rent was more than 21 days in arrears at the time the application was filed, and the tenancy is therefore terminated pursuant to section 55 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986. Applicant behaviour:
During the hearing, the applicant was dismissive of the Tribunal’s enquiries regarding the documentary and oral evidence.
The Tenancy Tribunal is a judicial forum established by the Residential Tenancies Act. Whilst remote video hearings may appear less formal than in-person hearings at the court, and are often conducted in that way for the comfort of the parties, basic decorum is still expected in online hearings, particularly from professionals. Burden of proof:
It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure the evidence necessary to establish their burden of proof is provided at the hearing.
The applicant did not initially provide the requisite evidence, and it would have been entirely appropriate, and in fact the default approach, to dismiss the application on the basis that the burden of proof had not been satisfied.
However, such an approach would penalise the property owner for the actions of their agent. I have therefore decided not to take that course and instead provided the applicant additional time to provide the evidence to the Tribunal. The filing fee:
Because the applicant has been successful, I award the filing fee. Suppression:
The request for suppression is declined due to the conduct of the applicant which weights the consideration in favour of the public interest in publication of the outcome. See section 95A(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5425703 — net $2,859.19 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 12/05/2026	$4,792.86	5. The applicant seeks rent arrears, water rates arrears, and termination of the tenancy.
Water rates to 08/04/2026	$238.33	Water rates to 08/04/2026
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,859.19
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,859.19

Claims and awards for application 5425703 — net $2,859.19 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears to 12/05/2026

Amount: $4,792.86
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: 5. The applicant seeks rent arrears, water rates arrears, and termination of the tenancy.

Water rates to 08/04/2026

Amount: $238.33
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates to 08/04/2026

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $28.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $2,859.19

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $2,859.19

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears Water Rates

Order

The tenancy of Raewyn Walker at 3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland 2024 is terminated, and possession is granted to 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Shi Yong Guo at 11:59pm on Tuesday 12 May 2026.
Raewyn Walker must pay 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Shi Yong Guo $2,859.19 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,200.00 (BN-00140429) to 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Shi Yong Guo immediately.

Reasons

The applicant attended the hearing by video link. The respondent did not attend or answer telephone contact attempts.
The applicant seeks rent arrears, water rates arrears, and termination of the tenancy.
Post-hearing, the applicant provided rent and water records showing the amounts owing. I am satisfied those records are accurate.
Rent was more than 21 days in arrears at the time the application was filed, and the tenancy is therefore terminated pursuant to section 55 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986. Applicant behaviour:
During the hearing, the applicant was dismissive of the Tribunal’s enquiries regarding the documentary and oral evidence.
The Tenancy Tribunal is a judicial forum established by the Residential Tenancies Act. Whilst remote video hearings may appear less formal than in-person hearings at the court, and are often conducted in that way for the comfort of the parties, basic decorum is still expected in online hearings, particularly from professionals. Burden of proof:
It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure the evidence necessary to establish their burden of proof is provided at the hearing.
The applicant did not initially provide the requisite evidence, and it would have been entirely appropriate, and in fact the default approach, to dismiss the application on the basis that the burden of proof had not been satisfied.
However, such an approach would penalise the property owner for the actions of their agent. I have therefore decided not to take that course and instead provided the applicant additional time to provide the evidence to the Tribunal. The filing fee:
Because the applicant has been successful, I award the filing fee. Suppression:
The request for suppression is declined due to the conduct of the applicant which weights the consideration in favour of the public interest in publication of the outcome. See section 95A(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5425703 — Rent arrears at 3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland 2024

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5425703 — Rent arrears at 3C Earlsworth Road, Mangere East, Auckland 2024

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions