What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5506279?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Devi Kanti at Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura,

How much money was awarded in case 5506279?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $1,950.00 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $76.02 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5506279?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5506279?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13662881-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5506279?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Devi Kanti at Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura,

How much money was awarded in case 5506279?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $1,950.00 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $76.02 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5506279?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5506279?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13662881-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura, Papakura Tenancy Tribunal Case 5506279 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura, Papakura Tenancy Tribunal Case 5506279 — Rent arrears | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5506279. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 28 May 2026	$1,950.00	Rent arrears to 28 May 2026
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Water rates	$76.02	Water rates

Claims and awards for application 5506279. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears to 28 May 2026

Amount: $1,950.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears to 28 May 2026

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $28.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Water rates

Amount: $76.02
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears Water Rates

Order

The tenancy of Devi Kanti at Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura, Papakura 2110 is terminated, and possession is granted to A Cube Rentals Limited, at 5pm 28 May 2026.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,054.02 (BN-32599140) to A Cube Rentals Limited immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:
The balance of the bond of $545.98 is to remain at the Bond Centre.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, set down to be conducted via video conference. There was no entry into the conference by the tenant, nor any prior contact with the Registry. A call to the tenant was attempted. The number was actually that of her granddaughter. The granddaughter confirmed the tenant had vacated the premises already.
I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the call went unanswered.
The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations. A claim for abandonment was also made but there was insufficient evidence of this and this order relies on s 56 Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) RTA.
Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.
The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent as due.
The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 11 May 2026, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.
It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the tenant has already vacated, as confirmed by a family member.
A further application by the landlord is expected as this is a fixed-term tenancy that remains vacant at this time with no immediate prospect of relet.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5506279. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 28 May 2026	$1,950.00	Rent arrears to 28 May 2026
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Water rates	$76.02	Water rates

Claims and awards for application 5506279. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears to 28 May 2026

Amount: $1,950.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears to 28 May 2026

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $28.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Water rates

Amount: $76.02
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears Water Rates

Order

The tenancy of Devi Kanti at Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura, Papakura 2110 is terminated, and possession is granted to A Cube Rentals Limited, at 5pm 28 May 2026.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,054.02 (BN-32599140) to A Cube Rentals Limited immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:
The balance of the bond of $545.98 is to remain at the Bond Centre.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, set down to be conducted via video conference. There was no entry into the conference by the tenant, nor any prior contact with the Registry. A call to the tenant was attempted. The number was actually that of her granddaughter. The granddaughter confirmed the tenant had vacated the premises already.
I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the call went unanswered.
The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations. A claim for abandonment was also made but there was insufficient evidence of this and this order relies on s 56 Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) RTA.
Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.
The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent as due.
The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 11 May 2026, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.
It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the tenant has already vacated, as confirmed by a family member.
A further application by the landlord is expected as this is a fixed-term tenancy that remains vacant at this time with no immediate prospect of relet.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5506279 — Rent arrears at Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura, Papakura

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5506279 — Rent arrears at Unit/Flat Flat 1, 10 Clevedon Road, Papakura, Papakura

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions