What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5558776 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of [The tenant/s] tenant/s] at 13D James Road, Manurewa,

How much money was awarded in case 5558776?

Filing Fee: $29.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $1,320.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5558776?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5558776?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/14114754-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5558776 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of [The tenant/s] tenant/s] at 13D James Road, Manurewa,

How much money was awarded in case 5558776?

Filing Fee: $29.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $1,320.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5558776?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5558776?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/14114754-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

13D James Road, Manurewa, Auckland 2102 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5558776 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5558776. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Rent arrears	$1,320.00		Rent arrears
Filing fee reimbursement	$29.00		Filing fee reimbursement

The tenancy of [The tenant/s] tenant/s] at 13D James Road, Manurewa, Auckland 2102 is terminated, and possession is granted to Tbt Property Management Limited As Agent For Dilip Pavaskar, at 11.59 am on Tuesday 1 September 2026.

The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,349.00 (BN-55061698) to Tbt Property Management Limited As Agent For Dilip Pavaskar immediately as calculated in the table below.

The balance of the bond of $1,291.00 is to remain at the Bond Centre.

Reasons

The landlord attended the remote hearing.

The tenant did not attend the hearing by Teams video link or by telephone. The Tribunal may hear matters in the absence of a party where satisfied that notice of the hearing has been given. I am satisfied that notice of the hearing was given.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.

The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent on time and in full.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 31 July 2026, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because despite having served the 14-day notice, the rent remains in arrears. The payment of rent is a fundamental obligation in any tenancy. Rent has been in arrears since 28 July 2026. I am not satisfied that the tenant will pay the rent as required in the future.

The tenancy is terminated.

As Tbt Property Management Limited As Agent For Dilip Pavaskar has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5558776. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Rent arrears	$1,320.00		Rent arrears
Filing fee reimbursement	$29.00		Filing fee reimbursement

The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,349.00 (BN-55061698) to Tbt Property Management Limited As Agent For Dilip Pavaskar immediately as calculated in the table below.

The balance of the bond of $1,291.00 is to remain at the Bond Centre.

Reasons

The landlord attended the remote hearing.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent on time and in full.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 31 July 2026, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.

The tenancy is terminated.

As Tbt Property Management Limited As Agent For Dilip Pavaskar has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5558776 — Rent arrears at 13D James Road, Manurewa, Auckland 2102

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5558776 — Rent arrears at 13D James Road, Manurewa, Auckland 2102

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Reduce avoidable tribunal risk with proper tenant checks.

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Reduce avoidable tribunal risk with proper tenant checks.