What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5384689?

The tribunal order states: Anya Broughton must pay Ngati Hine Health Trust $5,651.88 immediately,

How much money was awarded in case 5384689?

Cleaning: $305.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $200.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $100.00 awarded to landlord; Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Pest Control: $598.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $456.76 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $395.40 awarded to landlord; Rent In Credit: $77.43 awarded to tenant; Property Damage: $3,000.00 awarded to landlord; Replace Door Handles: $237.32 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $880.00 awarded to landlord; Smoke Alarms: $150.00 awarded to landlord; Water Payments In Credit: $5.17 awarded to tenant

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5384689?

The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Cleanliness, Smoke alarms.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5384689?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13387487-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5384689?

The tribunal order states: Anya Broughton must pay Ngati Hine Health Trust $5,651.88 immediately,

How much money was awarded in case 5384689?

Cleaning: $305.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $200.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $100.00 awarded to landlord; Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Pest Control: $598.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $456.76 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $395.40 awarded to landlord; Rent In Credit: $77.43 awarded to tenant; Property Damage: $3,000.00 awarded to landlord; Replace Door Handles: $237.32 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $880.00 awarded to landlord; Smoke Alarms: $150.00 awarded to landlord; Water Payments In Credit: $5.17 awarded to tenant

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5384689?

The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Cleanliness, Smoke alarms.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5384689?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13387487-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

87 Otaika Road, Raumanga, Whangarei 0110 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5384689 — Property damage

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

87 Otaika Road, Raumanga, Whangarei 0110 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5384689 — Property damage | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5384689 — net $5,651.88 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Pest control	$598.00		The claim for carpet cleaning is not proven. The entry inspection report noted that the carpet was stained at the beginning of the tenancy.
Rubbish removal	$880.00		Rubbish removal
Cleaning	$305.00		Cleaning
Window repairs	$456.76		Window repairs
Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting	$3,000.00		Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting
Compensation: Damage to heat pump	$100.00		Damage to heat pump
Compensation: Damage to benchtop	$200.00		Damage to benchtop
Replace smoke alarms	$150.00		Replace smoke alarms
Replace door handles	$237.32		Replace door handles
Replace damaged doors	$395.40		Replace damaged doors
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00		Filing fee reimbursement
Rent in credit		$77.43	Rent in credit
Water payments in credit		$5.17	Water payments in credit
Total award	$6,350.48	$82.60
Net award	$5,651.88
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$5,651.88

Claims and awards for application 5384689 — net $5,651.88 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Pest control

Amount: $598.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: The claim for carpet cleaning is not proven. The entry inspection report noted that the carpet was stained at the beginning of the tenancy.

Rubbish removal

Amount: $880.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Cleaning

Amount: $305.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning

Window repairs

Amount: $456.76
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Window repairs

Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting

Amount: $3,000.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Cleanliness Property damage Filing Fee Pest Control Rubbish Removal Replace Smoke Alarms

Order

Anya Broughton must pay Ngati Hine Health Trust $5,651.88 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $616.00 (BN-17101984) to Ngati Hine Health Trust immediately.

Reasons

Background

The tenancy ended on 23 February 2025.
The landlord’s application seeks repairs, cleaning, rubbish removal, replacement of chattels, and other costs.
The hearing took place in Whangarei on 1 April 2026. Mr Whaley represented Ngati Hine Health Trust at the hearing. There was no appearance by the tenant.
Notice of the application was served on the tenant 1 and the tenant did not contact the Tribunal or seek an adjournment of the hearing. The hearing proceeded in the tenant’s absence. 2 Cleaning, rubbish removal, pest control
Tenants must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and remove all rubbish at the end of the tenancy. 3
The landlord’s claim seeks: a. Pest control costs (fleas and cockroaches) $598.00. b. Skip bin hire $570.00. c. Disposal of fridge $150.00. d. Cleaning $305.00. e. Carpet cleaning $600.00. f. Lawns and gardens tidy up $70.00.
Mr Whaley provided photographs showing the condition of the premises at the end of the tenancy.
Having regard to those photographs my findings are that: a. The claims for general cleaning and for rubbish removal are proven and are fair and reasonable. The tenant left a substantial amount of rubbish and abandoned belongings at the premises including large items such as mattresses and furniture. It was necessary to hire a skip bin to dispose of the rubbish. The abandoned fridge could not be put in the skip bin and it 1 Section 91A(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”) 2 Section 92 RTA 3 Section 40(1)(e)(iii) RTA had to be transported to the tip separately. I have awarded four hours of labour at $40 per hour in addition to the skip bin hire and fridge dumping costs. b. The claim for carpet cleaning is not proven. The entry inspection report noted that the carpet was stained at the beginning of the tenancy. The entry photographs show that the carpet was aged and stained. There is not sufficiently clear evidence of new additional stains during this tenancy. c. The claim for tidy up of lawns and gardens is not proven. The end of tenancy photographs do not show the lawns and gardens. d. The claim for pest control costs is proven. Although it is difficult to evidence the presence of pests, the premises were not reasonably clean and tidy, and the invoice shows that the landlord incured this cost. Damage
Tenants are liable for damage beyond fair wear and tear that occurs during the tenancy.
The following parts of the landlord’s claim are proven: a. Reglazing three broken windows $456.76. b. Replace missing smoke alarms $150.00. c. Replace missing door handles $237.32. d. Damage to heat pump $100.00. e. Replacement of damaged doors $395.40.
The following parts of the claim are partially proven: a. Damage to walls. The photographs show that there was damage to the walls beyond fair wear and tear that occurred during this tenancy. The claim seeks $4,236.00 for repairs and painting. The entry photographs show that the paintwork was not new at the start of this tenancy in 2022. Depreciation must apply to the painting portion of this cost, but not to the repairs. The invoice does not detail the split between repairs and painting. I note that the damage to walls was quite extensive. On the limited information available to me I will award compensation of $3,000.00 for damage to the walls. b. Kitchen benchtop. The claim seeks $898.00 for replacement of the kitchen benchtop. The benchtop was newly installed in July 2024. At the end of the tenancy the benchtop had a small hole on the top. This is damage beyond fair wear and tear that occurred during the tenancy, but it is not obvious that the damage necessitated replacement of the benchtop. I do not know whether the option of repair was investigated. At the very least the hole could have been sealed to prevent water ingress. The benchtop would still function as a benchtop even with this damage. I will not award the replacement cost claimed, but I will award compensation to reflect the fact that the tenant caused damage beyond fair wear and tear. I will award $200.00.
The following parts of the claim are not proven: a. Replacement of curtains and blinds. The photographs do not evidence damaged or missing blinds. b. “Frame outside bed 7”. It is not clear what this claim relates to. c. Replacement of window handles. The damage is not proven. Rent and water credit
There was rent in credit at the end of the tenancy.
The tenant paid $30 per week towards water during the tenancy. The ledger shows that the tenant had a water credit of $505.41. The final water was $500.24, leaving a small amount of credit. Filing fee, bond
The bond will be released to the landlord.
Because the landlord was substantially successful in the application, I will also award the landlord the filing fee.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5384689 — net $5,651.88 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Pest control	$598.00		The claim for carpet cleaning is not proven. The entry inspection report noted that the carpet was stained at the beginning of the tenancy.
Rubbish removal	$880.00		Rubbish removal
Cleaning	$305.00		Cleaning
Window repairs	$456.76		Window repairs
Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting	$3,000.00		Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting
Compensation: Damage to heat pump	$100.00		Damage to heat pump
Compensation: Damage to benchtop	$200.00		Damage to benchtop
Replace smoke alarms	$150.00		Replace smoke alarms
Replace door handles	$237.32		Replace door handles
Replace damaged doors	$395.40		Replace damaged doors
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00		Filing fee reimbursement
Rent in credit		$77.43	Rent in credit
Water payments in credit		$5.17	Water payments in credit
Total award	$6,350.48	$82.60
Net award	$5,651.88
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$5,651.88

Claims and awards for application 5384689 — net $5,651.88 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Pest control

Amount: $598.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: The claim for carpet cleaning is not proven. The entry inspection report noted that the carpet was stained at the beginning of the tenancy.

Rubbish removal

Amount: $880.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Cleaning

Amount: $305.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning

Window repairs

Amount: $456.76
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Window repairs

Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting

Amount: $3,000.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: Repairs to walls and painting

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Cleanliness Property damage Filing Fee Pest Control Rubbish Removal Replace Smoke Alarms

Order

Anya Broughton must pay Ngati Hine Health Trust $5,651.88 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $616.00 (BN-17101984) to Ngati Hine Health Trust immediately.

Reasons

Background

The tenancy ended on 23 February 2025.
The landlord’s application seeks repairs, cleaning, rubbish removal, replacement of chattels, and other costs.
The hearing took place in Whangarei on 1 April 2026. Mr Whaley represented Ngati Hine Health Trust at the hearing. There was no appearance by the tenant.
Notice of the application was served on the tenant 1 and the tenant did not contact the Tribunal or seek an adjournment of the hearing. The hearing proceeded in the tenant’s absence. 2 Cleaning, rubbish removal, pest control
Tenants must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and remove all rubbish at the end of the tenancy. 3
The landlord’s claim seeks: a. Pest control costs (fleas and cockroaches) $598.00. b. Skip bin hire $570.00. c. Disposal of fridge $150.00. d. Cleaning $305.00. e. Carpet cleaning $600.00. f. Lawns and gardens tidy up $70.00.
Mr Whaley provided photographs showing the condition of the premises at the end of the tenancy.
Having regard to those photographs my findings are that: a. The claims for general cleaning and for rubbish removal are proven and are fair and reasonable. The tenant left a substantial amount of rubbish and abandoned belongings at the premises including large items such as mattresses and furniture. It was necessary to hire a skip bin to dispose of the rubbish. The abandoned fridge could not be put in the skip bin and it 1 Section 91A(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”) 2 Section 92 RTA 3 Section 40(1)(e)(iii) RTA had to be transported to the tip separately. I have awarded four hours of labour at $40 per hour in addition to the skip bin hire and fridge dumping costs. b. The claim for carpet cleaning is not proven. The entry inspection report noted that the carpet was stained at the beginning of the tenancy. The entry photographs show that the carpet was aged and stained. There is not sufficiently clear evidence of new additional stains during this tenancy. c. The claim for tidy up of lawns and gardens is not proven. The end of tenancy photographs do not show the lawns and gardens. d. The claim for pest control costs is proven. Although it is difficult to evidence the presence of pests, the premises were not reasonably clean and tidy, and the invoice shows that the landlord incured this cost. Damage
Tenants are liable for damage beyond fair wear and tear that occurs during the tenancy.
The following parts of the landlord’s claim are proven: a. Reglazing three broken windows $456.76. b. Replace missing smoke alarms $150.00. c. Replace missing door handles $237.32. d. Damage to heat pump $100.00. e. Replacement of damaged doors $395.40.
The following parts of the claim are partially proven: a. Damage to walls. The photographs show that there was damage to the walls beyond fair wear and tear that occurred during this tenancy. The claim seeks $4,236.00 for repairs and painting. The entry photographs show that the paintwork was not new at the start of this tenancy in 2022. Depreciation must apply to the painting portion of this cost, but not to the repairs. The invoice does not detail the split between repairs and painting. I note that the damage to walls was quite extensive. On the limited information available to me I will award compensation of $3,000.00 for damage to the walls. b. Kitchen benchtop. The claim seeks $898.00 for replacement of the kitchen benchtop. The benchtop was newly installed in July 2024. At the end of the tenancy the benchtop had a small hole on the top. This is damage beyond fair wear and tear that occurred during the tenancy, but it is not obvious that the damage necessitated replacement of the benchtop. I do not know whether the option of repair was investigated. At the very least the hole could have been sealed to prevent water ingress. The benchtop would still function as a benchtop even with this damage. I will not award the replacement cost claimed, but I will award compensation to reflect the fact that the tenant caused damage beyond fair wear and tear. I will award $200.00.
The following parts of the claim are not proven: a. Replacement of curtains and blinds. The photographs do not evidence damaged or missing blinds. b. “Frame outside bed 7”. It is not clear what this claim relates to. c. Replacement of window handles. The damage is not proven. Rent and water credit
There was rent in credit at the end of the tenancy.
The tenant paid $30 per week towards water during the tenancy. The ledger shows that the tenant had a water credit of $505.41. The final water was $500.24, leaving a small amount of credit. Filing fee, bond
The bond will be released to the landlord.
Because the landlord was substantially successful in the application, I will also award the landlord the filing fee.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5384689 — Property damage at 87 Otaika Road, Raumanga, Whangarei 0110

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5384689 — Property damage at 87 Otaika Road, Raumanga, Whangarei 0110

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions