What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5247773 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5247773?

Cleaning: $100.00 awarded to landlord; Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Power Reconnection Fee (Half: $37.50 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $2,200.00 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $69.00 awarded to landlord; TradeMe Advertising Fee: $171.35 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $45.59 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5247773?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears. Related themes: Cleanliness.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5247773?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12176798-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5247773 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5247773?

Cleaning: $100.00 awarded to landlord; Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Power Reconnection Fee (Half: $37.50 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $2,200.00 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $69.00 awarded to landlord; TradeMe Advertising Fee: $171.35 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $45.59 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5247773?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears. Related themes: Cleanliness.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5247773?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12176798-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

13C Von Sturmer Street, Mangere East, Auckland 2024 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5247773 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

13C Von Sturmer Street, Mangere East, Auckland 2024 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5247773 — Rent arrears | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5247773 — net $2,650.44 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 23 April 2025	$2,200.00	Rent arrears to 23 April 2025
Rubbish removal	$69.00	Rubbish removal
Cleaning	$100.00	Cleaning
Water rates	$45.59	Water rates
TradeMe advertising fee	$171.35	TradeMe advertising fee
Power reconnection fee (half	$37.50	Power reconnection fee (half
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,650.44
Bond	$2,800.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,650.44

Claims and awards for application 5247773 — net $2,650.44 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears to 23 April 2025

Amount: $2,200.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears to 23 April 2025

Rubbish removal

Amount: $69.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Cleaning

Amount: $100.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning

Water rates

Amount: $45.59
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates

TradeMe advertising fee

Amount: $171.35
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: TradeMe advertising fee

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Cleanliness Filing Fee Rent arrears Rubbish Removal Water Rates

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
[The tenant/s] to pay Gramax Property Management Limited As Agent For Ares Construction Development Limited $2,650.44 from the bond, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,800.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) immediately apportioned as follows: Gramax Property Management Limited As Agent For Ares Construction Development $2,650.44 Limited: [The tenant/s]: $149.56
The Tenant’s application is dismissed.

Reasons

The tenant filed an application on 29 April 2025 and the landlord filed a cross- application on 11 July 2025.
The tenant did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. Therefore, the tenant’s application is dismissed. 1
The landlord attended the hearing. The landlord seeks an order for rent arrears, outgoings, compensation, refund of the bond and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
As the applicant, the landlord must prove their claim to the civil law standard of proof, on the balance of probabilities. This means that they must establish that what they are claiming is more likely than not. This is referred to as the “burden of proof.” Independent witnesses, corroborating documents and photographs are an important part of discharging this burden.
As noted by the District Court in Katipo v Clarke & McCarthy (DC) TT233/02, in practical terms this means that: ...[L]ike anyone who brings an application before a Tribunal or Court, it is incumbent upon the applicant to provide the evidence necessary to prove the case. If the applicant fails to do that, then their application will be dismissed whether it has merit of not because it is up to the applicant to provide the necessary evidence. It is not up to the other parties, and it is certainly not up to the Tribunal to extract evidence.
I do not need to be completely certain, but I need to be more certain than uncertain. In deciding any particular claim, I must consider all the evidence presented (including oral evidence at the hearing). I must weigh this evidence to decide what is more likely.

RENT ARREARS

1 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 78(1)(i) & 92(1).

The law

A tenant must pay rent as and when it is due and payable under the tenancy agreement. 2
Under a fixed-term tenancy, the tenant must pay rent from the beginning of the tenancy to the end of the fixed term, unless the landlord gives the tenant permission to assign, sublet or end the tenancy early.
Section 60A(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA) states that a fixed-term tenancy of more than 90 days becomes a periodic tenancy unless: (a) Before the expiry, the parties renew or extend the existing tenancy agreement; or (b) Before the expiry, the parties agree not to continue with the tenancy; or (c) Within the effective period, either party gives to the other party written notice of their intention not to continue with the tenancy; or (d) Before the expiry, a party gives notice as specified in any of section 50(1)(a) to (ac) that terminates the tenancy on or before the expiry.
Section 60A(2A) defines the “effective period” as “the period that starts on the 90 th day before the date on which the tenancy expires and ends on the 21 st day before that date.” Analysis
The tenancy began on 9 April 2024 and was for a fixed-term until 9 April 2025.
The landlord submitted an email from the tenant sent to the landlord on 3 April 2025. In it, the tenant states that they do not want to continue with the tenancy after the expiry of the fixed-term.
The tenant gave the landlord notice of their intention not to continue with the tenancy only 6 days before the expiry of the fixed term, which is outside of the “effective period” under section 60A(1)(c). None of the other exceptions under section 60A(1) apply and therefore, the tenancy was due to become a periodic tenancy from 10 April 2025.
The landlord seeks rent arrears up to 24 April 2025, which is 21 days after the tenant gave the landlord notice of their intention to end the tenancy on 3 April 2025.
The landlord submitted a rent summary, which proves rent arrears are $2,200.0 up to 24 April 2025.
The landlord’s claim for rent arrears is granted for $2,200.00. 2 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 40(1)(a)

WATER

A tenant is responsible for all outgoings in respect of the premises that are exclusively attributable to the tenant’s occupation of the premises and use of the facilities. 3
The landlord gave evidence that the tenant owes $45.59 in water rates. The landlord submitted an original invoice from the water rates authority for this amount.
I accept the landlord’s evidence and grant their claim for compensation for $45.59. CLEANING & RUBBISH REMOVAL The law
At the end of a tenancy, the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and remove all rubbish. 4
“Reasonably” clean means clean to the standard an average, reasonable bystander would consider reasonable. 5 It does not mean commercially clean, 6 spotless 7 or to a hotel or motel standard. 8 The better the premises and the higher the rent payable, the higher the standard expected. 9 Analysis
The landlord claims the tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
The landlord submitted photographs taken at the end of the tenancy. Some glass jars have been left in the dishwasher by the tenant. There is also some rubbish and personal belongings that have been left outside the premises. Overall, the premises appears reasonably clean and tidy, with the exception of the rangehood, which has a noticeable build up of grease on it. 3 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 39(3). 4 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 40(1)(e)(iii). 5 Housing New Zealand v Holloway NZTT Auckland TT215/93, 8 February 1993 at [8]. 6 Mills v Kiwi Property Care Ltd NZTT Auckland TT215/93, 8 February 1993 at [8]. 7 Chang v Driscoll NZTT Christchurch TT2043/98, 21 July 1998 at [6]. 8 Richards v Scully NZTT Christchurch TT858/97, 8 May 1997 at [3]; Chang v Driscoll NZTT Christchurch TT2043/98, 21 July 1998 at [6]. 9 Westwood v Western [1994] DCR 759 at [770].
On the balance of probabilities, I find the tenant did not remove all rubbish and did not leave the rangehood in a reasonably clean and tidy condition.
The landlord submitted an invoice for $563.50 for professional cleaning and rubbish removal.
I do not think $563.50 needed to be spent to remove the tenant’s rubbish and return the premises to a reasonably clean and tidy condition. The amount of rubbish left behind by the tenant was small and with the exception of the rangehood, the premises appear reasonably clean and tidy. The floors appear to have been vacuumed and mopped. The bench surfaces have been wiped down and the bathroom appears to have been cleaned.
The landlord’s claim for compensation for cleaning and rubbish removal is granted for $169.00, which I find fairly reflects the amount of rubbish left behind by the tenant and state of the rangehood that needed cleaning. REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED IN ENDING THE FIXED-TERM TENNACY

EARLY

The law

A tenant may assign, sublet or part with possession from a tenancy with the prior written consent of the landlord and in accordance with any reasonable conditions attached to that consent by the landlord. 10
A landlord who consents to an assignment, subletting or parting with possession of a tenancy, is entitled to recover any reasonable expenses incurred from the outgoing tenant. 11
A landlord who seeks to recover expenses from a tenant must first provide an itemised account of the expenses to the tenant. 12 Analysis
The landlord gave evidence that in late 2024, the tenant verbally requested to end the fixed-term tenancy early. The landlord claims they agreed to this on the basis that the tenant pay the TradeMe advertising fee, as well as a “service fee” to cover the time spent by the landlord in finding a new tenant.
The landlord submitted an email sent to the tenant on 21 November 2024, stating that the cost of the TradeMe advertisement was $149.00 plus GST ($171.35 total) and the “service fee” was $325.00 plus GST ($373.75 total). 10 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 43B(1) & 44(2). 11 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 44A(1). 12 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 44A(2).
The landlord did not provide a breakdown of what the service fee covered.
The tenant replied to the landlord on 24 November 2024 confirming their instructions for the landlord to find a new tenant and a request that the landlord “[please] be quick about this.”
The landlord gave evidence that they advertised the premises on TradeMe, but because it took longer than expected to find a new tenant, the tenant withdrew their request to end the tenancy early. I accept the landlord’s evidence on this point.
The landlord seeks compensation to cover the cost of the TradeMe advertisement and “service fee.”
The landlord’s claim for compensation to cover the cost of the TradeMe advertisement is granted for $171.35. On the balance of probabilities, I am convinced the tenant asked the landlord to end the fixed-term tenancy early and the landlord incurred this cost before the tenant withdrew their request.
The landlord’s claim for compensation to cover the service fee of $373.75 is declined, because they did not provide the tenant with an itemised account of what the expense covered, as required by section 44A(2) RTA.

UTILITY RECONNECTION FEE

The landlord gave evidence that the premises were provided to the tenant with power supplied. The landlord claims the tenant disconnected the power entirely at the end of the tenancy on 23 April 2025, which meant the landlord was unable to complete the final inspection on 24 April 2025 and test their appliances. The landlord organised for the power to be reconnected at a cost of $75.00.
The usual process at the end of a tenancy is for a tenant to organise a final power meter reading for the last day of the tenancy, settle their account and close it. A tenant does not usually arrange for the physical disconnection of the power and I accept that the landlord was caught off-guard and inconvenienced by this.
The Tribunal must exercise its jurisdiction in a manner that is likely to ensure the fair and expeditious resolution of disputes between landlord’s and tenants. It must determine each dispute according to the general principles of law relating to the matter and the substantial merits and justice of the case, but is not bound to give effect to strict legal rights or obligations.
I find an order requiring the tenant to pay half of the cost of the reconnection fee promotes this purpose.
The landlord’s claim for compensation to reconnect the power is granted for $37.50. STRESS & INCONVENIENCE
The landlord seeks compensation for the stress and inconvenience caused by having to respond to the tenant’s application and submit their own application in the Tribunal.
The Tribunal is not a forum of general complaint. It deals with breaches of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
The fact that the tenant filed an application with the Tribunal, which the landlord found inconvenient and stressful to respond to, does not constitute a breach of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

FILING FEE

Because [The applicant/s] has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee and granted their request for name suppression.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5247773 — net $2,650.44 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears to 23 April 2025	$2,200.00	Rent arrears to 23 April 2025
Rubbish removal	$69.00	Rubbish removal
Cleaning	$100.00	Cleaning
Water rates	$45.59	Water rates
TradeMe advertising fee	$171.35	TradeMe advertising fee
Power reconnection fee (half	$37.50	Power reconnection fee (half
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,650.44
Bond	$2,800.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,650.44

Claims and awards for application 5247773 — net $2,650.44 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears to 23 April 2025

Amount: $2,200.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears to 23 April 2025

Rubbish removal

Amount: $69.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Cleaning

Amount: $100.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Cleaning

Water rates

Amount: $45.59
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates

TradeMe advertising fee

Amount: $171.35
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: TradeMe advertising fee

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Cleanliness Filing Fee Rent arrears Rubbish Removal Water Rates

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
[The tenant/s] to pay Gramax Property Management Limited As Agent For Ares Construction Development Limited $2,650.44 from the bond, calculated as shown in table below.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,800.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) immediately apportioned as follows: Gramax Property Management Limited As Agent For Ares Construction Development $2,650.44 Limited: [The tenant/s]: $149.56
The Tenant’s application is dismissed.

Reasons

The tenant filed an application on 29 April 2025 and the landlord filed a cross- application on 11 July 2025.
The tenant did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. Therefore, the tenant’s application is dismissed. 1
The landlord attended the hearing. The landlord seeks an order for rent arrears, outgoings, compensation, refund of the bond and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
As the applicant, the landlord must prove their claim to the civil law standard of proof, on the balance of probabilities. This means that they must establish that what they are claiming is more likely than not. This is referred to as the “burden of proof.” Independent witnesses, corroborating documents and photographs are an important part of discharging this burden.
As noted by the District Court in Katipo v Clarke & McCarthy (DC) TT233/02, in practical terms this means that: ...[L]ike anyone who brings an application before a Tribunal or Court, it is incumbent upon the applicant to provide the evidence necessary to prove the case. If the applicant fails to do that, then their application will be dismissed whether it has merit of not because it is up to the applicant to provide the necessary evidence. It is not up to the other parties, and it is certainly not up to the Tribunal to extract evidence.
I do not need to be completely certain, but I need to be more certain than uncertain. In deciding any particular claim, I must consider all the evidence presented (including oral evidence at the hearing). I must weigh this evidence to decide what is more likely.

RENT ARREARS

1 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 78(1)(i) & 92(1).

The law

A tenant must pay rent as and when it is due and payable under the tenancy agreement. 2
Under a fixed-term tenancy, the tenant must pay rent from the beginning of the tenancy to the end of the fixed term, unless the landlord gives the tenant permission to assign, sublet or end the tenancy early.
Section 60A(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA) states that a fixed-term tenancy of more than 90 days becomes a periodic tenancy unless: (a) Before the expiry, the parties renew or extend the existing tenancy agreement; or (b) Before the expiry, the parties agree not to continue with the tenancy; or (c) Within the effective period, either party gives to the other party written notice of their intention not to continue with the tenancy; or (d) Before the expiry, a party gives notice as specified in any of section 50(1)(a) to (ac) that terminates the tenancy on or before the expiry.
Section 60A(2A) defines the “effective period” as “the period that starts on the 90 th day before the date on which the tenancy expires and ends on the 21 st day before that date.” Analysis
The tenancy began on 9 April 2024 and was for a fixed-term until 9 April 2025.
The landlord submitted an email from the tenant sent to the landlord on 3 April 2025. In it, the tenant states that they do not want to continue with the tenancy after the expiry of the fixed-term.
The tenant gave the landlord notice of their intention not to continue with the tenancy only 6 days before the expiry of the fixed term, which is outside of the “effective period” under section 60A(1)(c). None of the other exceptions under section 60A(1) apply and therefore, the tenancy was due to become a periodic tenancy from 10 April 2025.
The landlord seeks rent arrears up to 24 April 2025, which is 21 days after the tenant gave the landlord notice of their intention to end the tenancy on 3 April 2025.
The landlord submitted a rent summary, which proves rent arrears are $2,200.0 up to 24 April 2025.
The landlord’s claim for rent arrears is granted for $2,200.00. 2 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 40(1)(a)

WATER

A tenant is responsible for all outgoings in respect of the premises that are exclusively attributable to the tenant’s occupation of the premises and use of the facilities. 3
The landlord gave evidence that the tenant owes $45.59 in water rates. The landlord submitted an original invoice from the water rates authority for this amount.
I accept the landlord’s evidence and grant their claim for compensation for $45.59. CLEANING & RUBBISH REMOVAL The law
At the end of a tenancy, the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and remove all rubbish. 4
“Reasonably” clean means clean to the standard an average, reasonable bystander would consider reasonable. 5 It does not mean commercially clean, 6 spotless 7 or to a hotel or motel standard. 8 The better the premises and the higher the rent payable, the higher the standard expected. 9 Analysis
The landlord claims the tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.
The landlord submitted photographs taken at the end of the tenancy. Some glass jars have been left in the dishwasher by the tenant. There is also some rubbish and personal belongings that have been left outside the premises. Overall, the premises appears reasonably clean and tidy, with the exception of the rangehood, which has a noticeable build up of grease on it. 3 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 39(3). 4 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 40(1)(e)(iii). 5 Housing New Zealand v Holloway NZTT Auckland TT215/93, 8 February 1993 at [8]. 6 Mills v Kiwi Property Care Ltd NZTT Auckland TT215/93, 8 February 1993 at [8]. 7 Chang v Driscoll NZTT Christchurch TT2043/98, 21 July 1998 at [6]. 8 Richards v Scully NZTT Christchurch TT858/97, 8 May 1997 at [3]; Chang v Driscoll NZTT Christchurch TT2043/98, 21 July 1998 at [6]. 9 Westwood v Western [1994] DCR 759 at [770].
On the balance of probabilities, I find the tenant did not remove all rubbish and did not leave the rangehood in a reasonably clean and tidy condition.
The landlord submitted an invoice for $563.50 for professional cleaning and rubbish removal.
I do not think $563.50 needed to be spent to remove the tenant’s rubbish and return the premises to a reasonably clean and tidy condition. The amount of rubbish left behind by the tenant was small and with the exception of the rangehood, the premises appear reasonably clean and tidy. The floors appear to have been vacuumed and mopped. The bench surfaces have been wiped down and the bathroom appears to have been cleaned.
The landlord’s claim for compensation for cleaning and rubbish removal is granted for $169.00, which I find fairly reflects the amount of rubbish left behind by the tenant and state of the rangehood that needed cleaning. REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED IN ENDING THE FIXED-TERM TENNACY

EARLY

The law

A tenant may assign, sublet or part with possession from a tenancy with the prior written consent of the landlord and in accordance with any reasonable conditions attached to that consent by the landlord. 10
A landlord who consents to an assignment, subletting or parting with possession of a tenancy, is entitled to recover any reasonable expenses incurred from the outgoing tenant. 11
A landlord who seeks to recover expenses from a tenant must first provide an itemised account of the expenses to the tenant. 12 Analysis
The landlord gave evidence that in late 2024, the tenant verbally requested to end the fixed-term tenancy early. The landlord claims they agreed to this on the basis that the tenant pay the TradeMe advertising fee, as well as a “service fee” to cover the time spent by the landlord in finding a new tenant.
The landlord submitted an email sent to the tenant on 21 November 2024, stating that the cost of the TradeMe advertisement was $149.00 plus GST ($171.35 total) and the “service fee” was $325.00 plus GST ($373.75 total). 10 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 43B(1) & 44(2). 11 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 44A(1). 12 Residential Tenancies Act 1986, section 44A(2).
The landlord did not provide a breakdown of what the service fee covered.
The tenant replied to the landlord on 24 November 2024 confirming their instructions for the landlord to find a new tenant and a request that the landlord “[please] be quick about this.”
The landlord gave evidence that they advertised the premises on TradeMe, but because it took longer than expected to find a new tenant, the tenant withdrew their request to end the tenancy early. I accept the landlord’s evidence on this point.
The landlord seeks compensation to cover the cost of the TradeMe advertisement and “service fee.”
The landlord’s claim for compensation to cover the cost of the TradeMe advertisement is granted for $171.35. On the balance of probabilities, I am convinced the tenant asked the landlord to end the fixed-term tenancy early and the landlord incurred this cost before the tenant withdrew their request.
The landlord’s claim for compensation to cover the service fee of $373.75 is declined, because they did not provide the tenant with an itemised account of what the expense covered, as required by section 44A(2) RTA.

UTILITY RECONNECTION FEE

The landlord gave evidence that the premises were provided to the tenant with power supplied. The landlord claims the tenant disconnected the power entirely at the end of the tenancy on 23 April 2025, which meant the landlord was unable to complete the final inspection on 24 April 2025 and test their appliances. The landlord organised for the power to be reconnected at a cost of $75.00.
The usual process at the end of a tenancy is for a tenant to organise a final power meter reading for the last day of the tenancy, settle their account and close it. A tenant does not usually arrange for the physical disconnection of the power and I accept that the landlord was caught off-guard and inconvenienced by this.
The Tribunal must exercise its jurisdiction in a manner that is likely to ensure the fair and expeditious resolution of disputes between landlord’s and tenants. It must determine each dispute according to the general principles of law relating to the matter and the substantial merits and justice of the case, but is not bound to give effect to strict legal rights or obligations.
I find an order requiring the tenant to pay half of the cost of the reconnection fee promotes this purpose.
The landlord’s claim for compensation to reconnect the power is granted for $37.50. STRESS & INCONVENIENCE
The landlord seeks compensation for the stress and inconvenience caused by having to respond to the tenant’s application and submit their own application in the Tribunal.
The Tribunal is not a forum of general complaint. It deals with breaches of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
The fact that the tenant filed an application with the Tribunal, which the landlord found inconvenient and stressful to respond to, does not constitute a breach of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

FILING FEE

Because [The applicant/s] has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee and granted their request for name suppression.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5247773 — Rent arrears at 13C Von Sturmer Street, Mangere East, Auckland 2024

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5247773 — Rent arrears at 13C Von Sturmer Street, Mangere East, Auckland 2024

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

RENT ARREARS

WATER

EARLY

UTILITY RECONNECTION FEE

FILING FEE

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

RENT ARREARS

WATER

EARLY

UTILITY RECONNECTION FEE

FILING FEE

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions